By John Kruzel
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. Supreme Court declined on Tuesday to hear a student’s challenge on free speech grounds to a Massachusetts public school’s decision to bar him from wearing a T-shirt reading “There are only two genders” due to concern about the message’s effect on transgender and other pupils.
The justices turned away an appeal by the student, who was 12 at the time of the 2023 incident, of a lower court’s ruling upholding the ban as a reasonable restriction and rejecting his claim that the school’s action violated the U.S. Constitution’s protections against government abridgment of speech.
The student, identified in court papers as “L.M.” because he is a minor, sued officials at John T. Nichols Middle School and the town of Middleborough, seeking monetary damages. A trial judge and then the Boston-based 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against him.
The 1st Circuit decision stated that “it was reasonable for Middleborough to forecast that a message displayed throughout the school day denying the existence of the gender identities of transgender and gender nonconforming students would have a serious negative impact on those students’ ability to concentrate on their classroom work.”
The legal dispute implicates a 1969 Supreme Court precedent in a case known as Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District that lets public schools restrict student speech when it would “substantially disrupt” a school community.
The issue of transgender rights is front and center in the U.S. culture wars. Since returning to office in January, Republican President Donald Trump has taken a hardline stance on transgender rights, targeting “gender ideology” and declaring that the U.S. government would recognize two sexes: male and female.
The Supreme Court on May 6 permitted Trump’s administration to implement his ban on transgender people in the military, allowing the armed forces to discharge the thousands of current transgender troops and reject new recruits while legal challenges play out.
L.M., who was a seventh grade student at the time, wore the T-shirt reading “There are only two genders” to school in March 2023. His lawyers said in court papers he did so in order to “share his view that gender and sex are identical, and there are only two sexes – male and female.”
“L.M. hoped to start a meaningful conversation on gender ideology, a matter of public concern; protect other students against ideas that L.M. considers false and harmful; and show them compassionate people can believe that sex is binary,” his lawyers wrote in a Supreme Court filing.
A teacher reported the shirt to the school principal’s office, noting that LGBT students were present at school that day and expressing concerns that the shirt could disrupt classes. The principal asked the boy if he would be willing to change his shirt and return to class, but he declined. The principal then called the boy’s father, Chris Morrison, who opted to pick up his son from school rather than have him remove his shirt.
Morrison, after complaining to school officials about the incident, was referred to the dress code in the school’s student handbook. It states: “Clothing must not state, imply, or depict hate speech or imagery that target(s) groups based on race, ethnicity, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, religious affiliation or any other classification.”
In May 2023, L.M. again wore the T-shirt to school, but covered the words “only two” with a piece of tape that read “censored,” thus bearing the message: “There are (censored) genders.” L.M. removed that shirt after being asked by school officials.
During the proceedings, the school system’s superintendent said that some students at John T. Nichols Middle School “have attempted to commit suicide or have had suicidal ideations in the past few years, including members of the LGBTQ+ community,” and that some of those students’ struggles were “related to their treatment based on their gender identities by other students.”
The boy, who brought the lawsuit along with his father and stepmother, are represented in the lawsuit by Alliance Defending Freedom, a conservative legal group that has represented clients in various high-profile cases before the Supreme Court.
The plaintiffs sought a court order prohibiting school officials from barring his wearing of the T-shirt and declaring the disputed portions of the dress code unconstitutional. They also sought unspecified monetary damages.
U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani, an appointee of Democratic former President Barack Obama, ruled in favor of the school officials. Her decision was upheld last year by the 1st Circuit, prompting the Supreme Court appeal.
The Supreme Court, which has a 6-3 conservative majority, is expected to rule by the end of June in a major transgender rights case. During arguments in the case in December, the conservative justices signaled their willingness to uphold a Republican-backed ban in Tennessee on gender-affirming medical care for transgender minors.
(Reporting by John Kruzel; Editing by Will Dunham)
Comments