By Richa Naidu and Hilary Russ
CHICAGO/NEW YORK (Reuters) – Germ-conscious in the pandemic era but still craving a donut and coffee? Procter & Gamble, which has already teamed up with Dunkin’ Brands to promote the use of its cleaning products in restaurants, is looking for more partners — and it’s hoping for a payoff in the grocery store aisle.
Procter & Gamble
P&G in July struck agreements with several existing restaurant partners – including Dunkin’ Brands’
It’s a “halo effect,” Paul Edmondson, the head of P&G Professional North America, said of the promotion’s marketing advantage. “It’s the same consumer that’s shopping in stores that’s eating out at one of the restaurants.”
P&G, one of the top advertising spenders in the United States, is racing against Clorox
“The reason why P&G wants to do this is because…it can produce free publicity,” said Kimberly Whitler, an associate professor of business at University of Virginia Darden School of Business and a former P&G marketing executive. “It’s a new outlet where consumers are not necessarily thinking about P&G products, and suddenly they’re seeing them there.”
Promoting household products such as Spic and Span, Dawn and Microban 24 sanitizer at major restaurant chains can serve as a cheap form of marketing for P&G, said Lisa Kane, group director for strategy at branding firm Siegel+Gale.
“It gives them more control, and they can choose who they partner with and allow this co-branding with,” Kane said. P&G’s clients may tout their locations as deep-cleaned and disinfected frequently, although the promotion doesn’t require an inspection or any independent verification by P&G that the locations are actually clean.
Disinfectants kill whatever is on a surface, but not long term – these businesses would have to spray things down over and over again if people are constantly sitting on chairs or using bathrooms, regulatory consultant Kevin Kutcel said. “Legally, ‘deep-cleaning’ doesn’t mean anything,” he added.
In May, Reckitt Benckiser signed a deal with Hilton Hotels
“We believe that advertising is our way to play offense, gain market share and benefit disproportionately for years to come,” Clorox’s chief executive, Benno Dorer, told Reuters in an interview. “We can grow market share when others do the opposite.”
Clorox, which plans to spend an amount representing about 11% of sales on advertising during this fiscal full year, said it is in talks with “a lot more companies” for corporate deals, but declined to name any in the works.
“There’s enough research suggesting that during a recession, market share gains are much stickier and have a much more profound long-term effect,” Dorer said.
P&G says marketing its products is not the main goal of its deals, and it is not forcing any restaurants to use stickers that specifically cite P&G brands.
To lure customers who may be nervous about dining out, some restaurant chains have begun putting signs in visible locations stating that they are participating in safety “seal of approval” programs run by the National Restaurant Association and other groups.
Nearly all advertisers have confronted a chaotic marketing landscape on TV and social media this year, reworking ads to be sensitive to national reckonings over the health crisis as well as racism.
P&G has spent more than $65 million to advertise Mr. Clean on TV so far this year, and more than $36 million on commercials for its home cleaner Microban, according to data from TV ad tracking firm iSpot.
(Reporting by Richa Naidu in Chicago and Hilary Russ in New York; Additional reporting by Sheila Dang in New York; Editing by Vanessa O’Connell and Leslie Adler)
